Original Article

Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Software in Predicting The Size of Impacted Canine: A Preliminary Study
  • Muralidharan Dhanasekaran
  • Shahul Hameed Faizee
  • Krishnaswamy Nathamuni Rengarajan
Turk J Orthod 0; 0: 0-0 [e-Pub] DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0160
Quantitative Comparison of Cephalogram and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisors
  • Diyang Wei
  • Lingyun Zhang
  • Weiran Li
  • Yilin Jia
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33: 85-91 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19097
Prevalence of Maxillary Permanent Canine Impaction in Relation to Anomalous Lateral Incisors
  • İlknur Veli
  • Burçin Yüksel
  • Tancan Uysal
Turk J Orthod 2014; 27: 90-99 DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-14-00025
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Bracket Systems on External Apical Root Resorption Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim
  • Esin Ozlek
Turk J Orthod 2021; 34: 109-115 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20029
Postoperative Positional and Dimensional Changes of Mandibular Canal after Bilateral Sagittal Split Set-Back Osteotomy
  • Duygu İşcan
  • Melih Motro
  • Ahu Acar
Turk J Orthod 2017; 30: 110-117 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17017
The Correlation Between Morphologic Characteristics of Condyle and Glenoid Fossa with Different Sagittal Patterns of Jaw Assessed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Navid Kariminasab
  • Zahra Dalili Kajan
  • Arefeh Hajian-Tilaki
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 268-275 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21136

Review

Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
  • İpek Coşkun
  • Burçak Kaya
Turk J Orthod 2018; 31: 55-61 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18020