Review

Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
  • Furkan Dindaroğlu
  • Enver Yetkiner
Turk J Orthod 2016; 29: 16-21 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00026R1
Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics
  • Oya Erten
  • Burcu Nur Yılmaz
Turk J Orthod 2018; 31: 86-94 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17041
Hıstorıcal Perspectıve And Current Status Of Cranıofacıal Imagıng In Orthodontıcs
  • Elif İdil Keser
  • İlken Kocadereli
Turk J Orthod 2004; 17: 116-125 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-17-1-116
Strategies for Managing the Risk of Mucogingival Changes During Impacted Maxillary Canine Treatment
  • Hakan El
  • Neda Stefanovic
  • Juan Martin Palomo
  • Leena Palomo
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33: 123-132 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20038
Reverse Engineering in Orthodontics
  • Hajra Ghafoor
Turk J Orthod 2018; 31: 139-144 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18027
Staging Orthodontic Aligners for Complex Orthodontic Tooth Movement
  • Shivam Mehta
  • Dolly Patel
  • Sumit Yadav
Turk J Orthod 2021; 34: 202-206 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20116

Original Article

Effects of High-Energy Curing Lights on Time-Dependent Temperature Changes of Pulp Space During Orthodontic Bonding
  • Nisa Gül Amuk
  • Gökmen Kurt
  • Özgür Er
  • Gülşen Çakmak
  • Veysel Aslantaş
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 22-27 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.19015
Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Metal Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Long-term Water-aged and Fresh Porcelain and Composite Surfaces
  • Yeşim Kaya
  • Beyza Ünalan Değirmenci
  • Alperen Değirmenci
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 28-33 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18034
Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements Performed on Smartphone-Based Application and Computer-Based Imaging Software: A Comparative Study
  • Vinay Kumar Chugh
  • Navleen Kaur Bhatia
  • Dipti Shastri
  • Sam Prasanth Shankar
  • Surjit Singh
  • Rinkle Sardana
Turk J Orthod 2023; 36: 94-100 DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.60 PMID:37346006
Postoperative Positional and Dimensional Changes of Mandibular Canal after Bilateral Sagittal Split Set-Back Osteotomy
  • Duygu İşcan
  • Melih Motro
  • Ahu Acar
Turk J Orthod 2017; 30: 110-117 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17017
Changes in Angulation and Eruption Space of Developing Mandibular Third Molars Following Twin Block Treatment
  • Hanem Younes Elfeky
  • Engy Ali Abdelhaleem Salam
  • Fouad Aly El Sharaby
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 166-172 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21122
Measurement of The Centric Relation-Maximum Intercuspation Difference: MRI Versus The SAM® Mandibular Position Indicator
  • Berna Turası
  • Sibel Biren
  • Arzu Arı-Demirkaya
Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 199-208 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-3-199
Efficiency and Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Models Versus Dental Casts: A Clinical Study
  • Hakan Yılmaz
  • Fethiye Çakmak Özlü
  • Carmen Karadeniz
  • Ersan İlsay Karadeniz
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 214-218 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.19034
Does Activator Therapy Change Sagittal Mandibular Dimension and Glenoid Fossa Position? A Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
  • Hatice Gökalp
Turk J Orthod 2007; 20: 239-249 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-20-3-239

Case Report

Assessment of Deep Overbite Treatment effect on Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Case Report
  • Hatice Gökalp
  • Öykü Nebioğlu-Dalcı
Turk J Orthod 2009; 22: 64-74 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-22-1-64

Research

A Comparison of Conventional and Computerized Cephalometric Methods
  • Mevlüt Çelikoğlu
  • Doğan Kılkış
Turk J Orthod 2012; 25: 105-112 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-25-2-105

Review

Standardization of Records in Orthodontics Part 2: Craniofacial Imaging Techniques
  • Faruk İzzet Uçar
  • Ahmet Ercan Şekerci
  • Tancan Uysal
  • Ali Osman Bengi
Turk J Orthod 2012; 25: 167-187 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-25-2-167